As individuals move from their working years into retirement, the nature of tax planning changes. During a career, taxes are largely about marginal brackets, withholding, and deductions tied to earned income. In retirement, however, the most meaningful costs often stem from income thresholds. Cross one of these thresholds—even by a small amount—and the financial consequences can be disproportionate.
At the center of many of these thresholds is Modified Adjusted Gross Income, commonly known as MAGI. For pre-retirees and retirees, MAGI is one of the most influential income measures they will encounter, yet it is also one of the least intuitive. The reason is straightforward: MAGI does not have a single, universal definition. Instead, it is recalculated differently depending on which rule, tax, or benefit is being applied.
Understanding MAGI is less about memorizing formulas and more about recognizing how income decisions ripple across multiple areas of retirement planning.
MAGI Begins With Adjusted Gross Income (AGI)
Every MAGI calculation starts with Adjusted Gross Income, or AGI. This is a defined figure on the individual tax return and appears on line 11 of IRS Form 1040. It reflects total income from all sources—wages, pensions, IRA distributions, interest, dividends, capital gains, and Social Security benefits (to the extent they are taxable, which for many retirees is up to 85% of the benefit)—reduced by certain above-the-line deductions such as IRA contributions, Health Savings Account contributions, and self-employed health insurance premiums.
From that starting point, MAGI is created by adding back specific items. What gets added back depends entirely on the provision being applied. This is where confusion often arises, as one may incorrectly assume MAGI is a single number shown on the tax return. In reality, it is a series of calculations that begin with AGI and are then modified differently depending on the context.
MAGI for Medicare Premium Surcharges (IRMAA)
One of the most financially significant uses of MAGI in retirement is for Medicare’s Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount, or IRMAA. IRMAA is a surcharge added to standard Medicare Part B and Part D premiums for beneficiaries whose income exceeds certain thresholds — in effect, higher earners pay more for the same coverage. For this purpose, MAGI is defined as AGI plus tax-exempt interest. While municipal bond interest is excluded from taxable income, it is included here.
This distinction becomes important because Medicare premiums are determined using a tiered system, with a two-year lookback. Income reported today can affect premiums two years from now. A one-time income event—such as a Roth conversion or a large capital gain—can therefore increase premiums for an entire year.
Consider a married couple with an AGI of $200,000 and $15,000 of tax-exempt interest. Their Medicare MAGI becomes $215,000. Given the applicable 2026 threshold for the first IRMAA tier is $218,000 for married filers, that particular couple would not yet be affected—but a couple with slightly higher income ($3,001+) would cross that line, pushing both spouses into a surcharge tier for an entire year. This is why IRMAA is often described as a “cliff” rather than a gradual progression.
MAGI and Roth IRA Contribution Eligibility
MAGI also determines eligibility for direct Roth IRA contributions. In this case, the calculation begins with AGI and adds back certain deductions, including traditional IRA deductions and some education-related adjustments. Notably, tax-exempt interest is not included in this version of MAGI.
This variation highlights an important point: different rules use different definitions. A pre-retiree may find themselves below the IRMAA threshold while simultaneously being above the Roth contribution limit, or vice versa.
For 2026, the Roth IRA phase-out range for single filers and heads of household runs from $153,000 to $168,000; for married couples filing jointly, from $242,000 to $252,000. Within those ranges, the allowable contribution is reduced proportionally until it reaches zero at the upper limit. The maximum annual contribution for 2026 is $7,500, or $8,600 for individuals age 50 and older. That higher figure reflects the $7,500 base limit plus a $1,100 catch-up contribution, an amount that is now adjusted annually for inflation under the SECURE 2.0 Act.
For example, a single individual age 55 with an AGI of $148,000 who is not covered by a workplace retirement plan and deducts an $8,600 traditional IRA contribution would have a Roth MAGI of $156,600—inside the phase-out range, meaning only a partial Roth contribution is permitted. An income increase of roughly $11,400 over the course of the year would eliminate eligibility entirely, which is why careful income monitoring matters for those who are near but below the upper threshold.
MAGI and the Net Investment Income Tax
The Net Investment Income Tax, often referred to as the 3.8% surtax, is another area where MAGI plays a role. For this purpose, MAGI is largely equivalent to AGI, with foreign income added back where applicable. The tax applies once income exceeds certain thresholds – $200,000 for single filers and $250,000 for married couples.
Retirees are sometimes caught off guard by this tax. Even without earned income, a large capital gain or significant portfolio income can push total income above the threshold. A retired couple with $210,000 of baseline income who realizes an additional $80,000 capital gain would have total income of $290,000—exceeding the $250,000 threshold by $40,000. The 3.8% surtax applies to the lesser of net investment income or the amount above the threshold, meaning $40,000 of that gain would be subject to an additional $1,520 in tax. The issue is not the tax bracket itself, but the interaction between income levels and specific thresholds.
MAGI for Affordable Care Act Health Insurance Subsidies
For those who retire before Medicare eligibility, MAGI takes on yet another meaning under the Affordable Care Act. In this context, the calculation is broader. It includes AGI, tax-exempt interest, and even non-taxable Social Security benefits.
This can lead to unexpected results. An early retiree may believe their income is modest based on taxable figures, yet find that their ACA income is significantly higher. For instance, IRA withdrawals combined with largely non-taxable Social Security and modest municipal bond income can push MAGI to a level that reduces or eliminates premium subsidies. Without careful planning, healthcare costs can rise sharply.
New Deductions Under the OBBBA and How They Interact With MAGI
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), signed into law in 2025, introduced two deductions that are especially relevant to retirees: a $6,000 senior deduction and a higher cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions. Both provide meaningful tax relief, but each operates differently from the MAGI-based rules discussed above—and from each other.
The Senior Bonus Deduction: For tax years 2025 through 2028, taxpayers age 65 and older can claim an additional $6,000 deduction. For married couples where both spouses are 65 or older, the combined deduction is $12,000.
What makes this provision unusual is its structural independence. The senior bonus deduction is neither part of the standard deduction nor an itemized deduction. It is a separate below-the-line deduction that reduces taxable income directly, and it is available regardless of whether the taxpayer takes the standard deduction or itemizes on Schedule A. In practice, this means it stacks on top of whichever approach the taxpayer already uses—a feature that distinguishes it from nearly every other individual deduction in the tax code.
The phase-out for this deduction is based on MAGI—not simply AGI. However, the MAGI definition used here is a narrow one: AGI increased only by certain excluded foreign income (from sources such as Guam, American Samoa, Puerto Rico, and the Northern Mariana Islands, plus the foreign earned income exclusion). For the vast majority of domestic retirees with no foreign income, MAGI for this purpose will equal AGI exactly. Critically, tax-exempt municipal bond interest is not added back—unlike the IRMAA calculation—and non-taxable Social Security is not added back either.
The phase-out begins at $75,000 of MAGI (single) or $150,000 (married filing jointly), reducing the deduction by 6% of every dollar above those thresholds. On a joint return where both spouses are 65 or older, each spouse’s $6,000 deduction is phased out independently using the same joint MAGI figure—which means both deductions reach zero at the same income level. The deduction is fully eliminated at $175,000 (single) and $250,000 (joint). Married filing separately filers are not eligible.
The SALT Deduction: Under the OBBBA, the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap rises from $10,000 to $40,000 for tax years 2025 through 2029, before reverting to $10,000 in 2030. Beginning in 2026, both the $40,000 cap and the phase-out threshold are indexed upward by 1% annually through 2029, a modest but cumulative adjustment that is worth tracking for multi-year planning purposes. This is an itemized deduction; taxpayers must forgo the standard deduction to use it.
Like the senior deduction, the SALT phase-out also uses MAGI—and the same narrow definition applies: AGI plus foreign income exclusions, which will equal AGI for most domestic retirees. The phase-out begins at $500,000 of MAGI for both single and joint filers (notably, the threshold does not double for married couples, creating a potential marriage penalty in high-tax states). The deduction is reduced by 30% of every dollar above $500,000 and cannot fall below $10,000. The full phase-out is complete at $600,000 of MAGI. Because the $500,000 threshold and the $40,000 cap both rise by 1% per year, those figures will be slightly higher in 2026 through 2029—but the basic mechanics remain the same.
The important distinction for planning purposes is not that these deductions use AGI rather than MAGI—both technically use MAGI, though with a definition that equals AGI for most retirees. The more consequential point is that both deductions operate below the AGI line. They reduce taxable income, but they do not reduce the income figures used to calculate Medicare premiums, the investment surtax, or other MAGI-driven thresholds, which are calculated before these deductions apply.
This means a retiree may benefit from meaningful deductions and see a lower tax bill, yet still face higher Medicare premiums or limited Roth eligibility because those systems rely on income measured before these deductions reduce taxable income. Not all tax savings translate into lower “planning income,” and understanding that difference has become increasingly important.
It is also worth noting that the two OBBBA deductions use different phase-out structures from each other. The senior deduction begins phasing out at $75,000–$150,000 of MAGI and is gone by $175,000–$250,000; the SALT phase-out doesn’t begin until $500,000 and is complete at $600,000. A retiree could be fully phased out of the senior deduction while retaining the full SALT benefit — for example, a married couple with $300,000 of MAGI would lose the senior bonus entirely but remain well below the SALT phase-out threshold, preserving the full $40,000 deduction if they itemize.
MAGI as a Multi-Year Planning Lens
Taken together, these examples highlight a broader truth. MAGI is not simply a tax calculation; it is a coordination tool. In retirement, income is often flexible. Withdrawals can be timed, Roth conversions can be sized, and capital gains can be realized strategically.
The objective is not always to minimize taxes in a single year. More often, it is to manage income across multiple years in a way that avoids unnecessary surcharges, preserves eligibility for valuable benefits, and maintains long-term flexibility. Handling MAGI is one of the primary mechanisms through which these outcomes are achieved.
Abramson Financial Planning, LLC does not warrant the accuracy of the materials provided herein. Although the information provided is from sources which we believe to be reliable, we do not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information for any particular purpose. This information is for information purposes and does not constitute a recommendation for the purchase or sale of securities. Individual investment decisions should be made based on each investor’s financial condition, suitability, and risk tolerance. Investments may be volatile and can involve the loss of principal. Past performance is no guarantee of future returns. Abramson Financial Planning’s employees may trade for their own accounts in any of the securities of issuers mentioned herein or in related investments. Abramson Financial Planning does not undertake to provide clients with tax, legal, or accounting advice, and clients are admonished to consult their own attorneys and accountants for determining the tax, legal, and accounting consequences of investments made on their behalf.